Search results

I got it in a bundle months back. May even play it one day.

So your argument boils down to 'When Obsidian did it, it was alright'? Bullshit by one company is equal to bullshit from another. No exceptions.

The Survivalist that everyone raves about in the Honest Hearts DLC has been lying on an exposed hilltop quite happily for over a century...

You could have said the same about the release of Fallout 2. I'm still grumpy about having to restart when I had the memory error from visiting too many locations, and the game crashing every time you try to go somewhere now. Sure it was patched, but saves weren't compatible... Not to mention...

I'm finding the game to be a lot of fun, but it is badly flawed... That said, currently, I'm having a lot more fun than I had with any other game in the series other than F2 (I started with a few hours of F2, then put it to one side to complete the original, then went back to F2), but that...

I lost interest in this game a decade or so back. I'll play it eventually, but not till I can pick it up for peanuts. Still, I'm glad its doing well.

Those are probably empty cases that were ready weeks ago.

Yeah... No. My first game in the series was Fallout 2 which I picked up more-or-less on release via a mail-order company, followed by F1 a week or so later. F2 I can name and describe 30-40 characters in the manner asked. F1... Lots of caricatures and stereotype NPC's, but not much depth...

I half attempted this with Fallout 1, and pretty much drew a blank.

I doubt I'll be able to run it, as my PC has gone 8 years without an upgrade. Still, it ran Skyrim so I'll still give it a go, and if it doesn't work... No great loss.

In the order I played them in: I loved Fallout 2, thought Fallout 1 was great, thought Tactics was good, but flawed, initially found Fallout 3 to be annoying, but after my second or third attempt to get into the game found it to be fun but shallow, and thought New Vegas was great. Regarding...

I've been playing it quite it bit via Bluestacks, and am having fun... Mostly. It does force you to pay attention whilst its running though, else you can easily lose most your 'dwellers' to what would otherwise be a simple problem. Stands to reason though, as its meant to be something you...

You could pretty much have said the same about buying a digital copy off GOG or Steam before the rights switched to Bethesda - You were giving money to Herve Caen.

Perhaps. But at least we're getting newsposts now.

Why? The same reason people like art.

Square attempted doing that with a Deus Ex game. They announced there would be one, then revealed Deus Ex: The Fall - The community spat in their faces and the game flopped.

Bethesda mentioned part of the reason why a few days after E3: If they had simply announced that they were working on a free-to-play mobile game with micro-transactions, the gaming community would have been in uproar about how its not what they want. By announcing F4, along with 'oh, we've...

We've got Quake Con next week, so that's the next time F4 will be seen and questions answered, though it won't be broadcast/streamed/whatevered.

Absolutely nothing. I have asked a couple of questions of Bethesda and even got answers. Nothing important, true, but questions I wanted answers to regardless. But people (probably not many these days admittedly) visit NMA for Fallout news, and having it on the site is kind of the purpose for...

So you're saying that in your opinion, NMA should all but shut down then? After all, there won't be another traditional Fallout game. For whatever reason, (I'm sure its been mentioned) they don't report on Wasteland 2 (Yet MCA quitting his job is deemed worthy of being a news article), and...