Search results

I wonder what mysterious site that was!

Then it's decided, no Torment coverage.

We used up our science fantasy quota posting on Age of Decadence.

The areas had different teams of designers and scripters assigned to them, so it's pretty inconsistent.

Unforgiven and Silverado are OK. Dr Quinn: the Moive. Edit: High Noon?

Having not seen IB, I can say that PF > RD >> everything else >>> Death Proof.

Stop posting from the future, alec.

Haha, you couldn't make stuff like this up. "Ivory dungeons". "Apocaleptics".

Cabin in the Woods is funny. Scott Pilgrim is funny. Prometheus is complete bullshit.

Could it be "The Sandkings" from The Outer Limits?

There must be a discontinuity here - antagonizing Arroyo would end the game as soon as she entered the world map. It's basically the one thing you can't do.

BN promotes GOG because of nachos True story

What does that even mean, and why does it even matter? Do the various opinions of the various posters somehow have to match up with Tim Cain's?

This could have been an awesome running gag during the development process. Too bad they had to explain it.

Throwing would have worked a lot better if there had been high-end perks for it.

We don't even know if there is a "they".

As described it is neither.

So why stop at one consultant firm? Of course, Thwacke could have subcontracted, we'll never know.

I have to admit, this was my initial reaction as well. The examples given here are kind of reassuring, but it's hard to shake the feeling that designers who get paid fat amounts of insane cash should be able to just look/make these things up as needed.

Level drain worked in BG2 because like some other stuff in the game, it pulled ideas from D&D3 (you kept earning xp, so once you could cast Restoration it was as if nothing had happened). In the old gold box games, at best you lost your progress on your current level, and I can't even remember...