Search results

Radiation doesn't really hurt you in the short term, from what I know.

Logically I think by the time of Fallout 3 there would be more infrastructure. But, it's easy to rationalize why there isn't. Things to consider: The more advanced you are, the harder you fall. Yes, tech can and would be salvaged. But to implement it back into society on a massive scale...

It is? I'm glad no raider looked in the oven I stored all my crap in!

Whatever. It feels like the wasteland to me.

You have to figure the eastern seaboard got hit harder than the southwest. I don't think it should be a huge issue. I like that it's present. I don't know how accurate the portrayal is, but you have to have some radiation in a post-apocalypse game. It would be like fantasy without wimpy elves.

I forgive it for not being very Fallouty cause it rocks.

Really, I would be happy if they just focused on writing a really compelling main quest in the next one. From a technical aspect the game is perfectly adequate. I'd love to be able to shoot through walls and kick down doors though.

It guilts you into killing them.

I don't really care about blowing away Tom Cruise. If they had left San Fran out, Fallout 2 would have been much better. A (non kung-fu) Shi settlement and the tanker to the Enclave was plenty. I think they just wanted to cram more content in there. The Hubologists have no place in the game...

I've been thinking about the "it's too easy!" complaint that I see a lot of. Two things make it easy, VATS and being able to access your inventory while taking a nailboard to the forehead. On the hard level, they should disable both of those capabilities. So, no VATS on hard, and if you...

If you have limited space, I cannot begin to stress how preferable a small dog is to a big one.

There are plenty of artistically inspired moments in Fallout 3, but I'm not sure it's especially revolutionary. Any product requiring someone's creative talents should be considered art. A lot of the art in games is under the hood, so to speak. Different games are artsy in different ways...

Is there a thread about Fallout 3 that hasn't fallen victim to the oh-so-fresh slam/defend model of typical NMA Fallout discussion? I'd like to post there. If you have no use for Fallout 3, is it too much to ask that you refrain from posting in threads like these? Do we need the constant...

I don't see the point to a major expansion. may as well just work on Fallout 4, unless they plan on making that on a new engine or something.

The previous games felt less desolate than Fallout 3, considering you never actually walked through the wasteland. You just made a straight red line to wherever you wanted to go. Quite an abstraction. If you did stop, it was because something was attacking you. Otherwise you just jumped from...

Of course it's flawed, every game is flawed. I'm just not sure there is an ounce of objectivity at this site. Nothing wrong with that, it's just that everyone gets pushed to the side they want to support so they sound like an irrational hater/lover. It's political in that way.

I don't read that as I'm not a big Azzarello fan but Risso is one of the best artists in the biz. I look forward to whatever he does next. Issue 100 recently came out, I think.