Search results

The next one doesn't have to follow on from Fallout 3 chronologically. "Fallout 4" could always be set in the same time period, but in a different part of the country. I don't see any reason why Fallout 4 has to be set in the years after the others. Hell, I don't see why most of the events...

I think its pretty cool that we will get to experience an important part of the Fallout world's history in-game. I really like the idea and it will greatly expand my understanding and feel for the Fallout world.

Ok like seriously, half the people in this topic are insane. You guys need to lay off for a second and look at what you're criticising. The stuff in Van Buren with Harold becoming a fruit farm was just as silly and imo doesn't really capture the Fallouty sort of humour and 50s-esque style...

[sorry, internet problems, delete this too]

[sorry, internet problems, delete this]