Search results

Fast travel is in, but no random encounters while fast traveling. Which sucks, if you ask me. No more worrying if I have enough shotgun ammo to see off any radscorpions. Probably not when a) there's no real need for the player to be able to travel faster (no random encounters) and b) your...

Not like anyone is going to be able to sue them for it, hey? :D

The game developers have stated that Hand to Hand combat can/will be lethal, and you can equip things like brass-knuckles to do more damage. And they also said that using melee combat will do lots of damage to make up for the distance you would need to cross to get to your target. I cant...

Re: Fallout 3 Questions Yeah, I never expect any game to really exceed Fallout's place in my heart. The best I hope for from FO3 is a fun game that is worth the money (especially after mods allow me to butcher children! Bwahahaha!).

"If" they release Fallout Online (or whatever it's gonna be named). Plus, I don't think a MMO will ever have the kind of depth that a single player RPG could have. It'll only take one guy yelling "lf1g new reno pst" to ruin it for me.

To me, the first two are more important than the third. Fallout had something special that few games I have played ever had. Deus Ex, Half-Life, Arcanum, these games all created a very believable world filled with characters I was actually interested in rather than 'Generic Scientist Guy' or...

I can see your point. I mean, if Blizzard were to make a first-person Diablo 3, it would be a huge-shift in terms of how the game would feel for the user. But in my opinion, the shift from isometric isn't a game-breaker for me. There are other issues I am concerned with, and games like Deus...

I gotta agree with you Zembar. Fallout was about the ability to help immerse yourself in the experience by making choices shaped by the 'atmosphere' of Fallout more than being just a turn-based RPG. Would I have prefered a Fallout 3 that was an isometric turn-based game? Of course! But I...