Search results

MTV Multiplayer has a piece about what we actually know about the Vegas of New Vegas, which Obsidian has apparently been secretive about. Here's a snip:<blockquote>A Grittier "Fallout"...If That Were Possible The original two "Fallout" games -- especially the second -- were surprisingly grim...

Fixing Fallout 3's gameplay is mighty simple: you just take clutter off the wasteland, particularly meds and water everywhere, and kill 97% of the combat. Then it's fixed.

I don't think everyone here will be p(l)aying the game...

You speak as if New Vegas' target audience isn't kids...

Better than Fallout 2? That would be Fallout 1...

It helps us forget that everything else in the game will be as bad or even worse... At least for me... Well, not everything. Quest design and shit. That's because Bethesda knows how to go around their engine's limitations. It's relatively easy, if you've ever fired up their CS, but it...

Talking about the last screenshot, it's really dumb, for any game, to hold the rifle that hit to shoot at something that's so close... And this is a Fallout game! Where tactics are supposed to matter (a bit)? Lol.[/rant] Seriously though, it looks VERY stupid. Also no shadows make it...

I always thought furries were furries because they liked the nakedness of furries mixed with how much emphasis is given, by the fur patterns, to the shapes of the bodies! Now I find out (after a wikipedia search) that furries are just deranged individuals with completely improper tastes...

A harsh world full of medicine, food and water all around? Don't think so.

"Low-fi" WTF is that?! :\ "Amusing dialog" Worrisome...

What he means is that he hopes the game doesn't have a compulsory tutorial mode every time he starts a new game with not relevant options and that is, on top of that, underdesigned and dumbed down.

It'll be interesting to see how the fanbase will react to this game... I'm expecting a similar phenomenon to what happened with NWN2, only multiplied because it's NMA coverage.

There's a freaking screen in front of you! You are inside your house, sitting in a couch or chair! There's technology all around and whatnot! What kind of game could ever be immersive with these limitations? There is no immersiveness, there's only graphical and sound fidelity.

Planescape is 2000, isn't it? And if you mean the "real" decade that starts in 2001 and ends in 2010, then it's not over yet. That's also the reason why I think we're talking about the "fake/sucker's" decade, the one that starts in 2000 and ends in 2009. Like the sucker's millenium, the one...

Lol @ generalissimo. Only now? My choice is Planescape.

That's all very good and fine, except KotOR was actually a solidly designed game. Unlike it's counterpart in your analogy.

Well, Fallout 3 WAS a return to their terminator shooter series. They are very old...

I rest my case.

Ok, I don't know every ARPG developed in the last years, but I can think of a few that failed, and all of those come from either new companies or companies that are not well known: Hellgate, Shadowcast (or whatever that Xbox360/PC game was), Bulletwitch, there are plenty of asian-like...

Lol. That's pretty much granted. What AAA ARPG that has come from a company that's not well know/mainstream has succeeded in the last years? I can't think of any. Tough to hear. I hope you find your own way, though. If it serves as any consolation, however, I'd like to say that settings are...