Search results

Double posting still wouldn't be a problem if everybody did it. (which double posting isn't going to happen all the time and doesn't happen all the time.) It's such a non issue I'd say for most forums, including NMA. It doesn't make the forums look unprofessional or whatever else I've seen...

I've never really understood why people make such a big deal about double posting. (If that's what you're talking about here.) Sure, most forums have a rule against double posting, but to me it seems like a few posts in a row by the same user doesn't really do, or detract from, anything. As...

Did he? Because on his tumblr he said "recreating the new world in the image of the old" and then said "As for why these groups do it, they look at the pre-war world and think that they can rebuild better or more quickly if they pattern what they’re doing on what has been done before"

Though if they did that enough I bet you'd have a lot of people on the other end of the spectrum clamoring on about how Bethesda is making too many choices for them and forcing too many things on their characters.

Just because I keep seeing this, but some amphibians have gills, or start out with them. And amphibians are not fish.

I actually wasn't making it into that big of a deal. Though it did sort of get that way with subsequent replies. Mostly, I'd say, because of the wrong assumptions from you guys, or the missinterpretion of what I was doing. (Even though I clearly stated over and over what I was doing and why I...

What argument? Again, what I did was point out how you attacked and insulted him, while saying he was the one making attacks and insults and condemning him for it. You, and everybody else can go back and read your initial post or where I quoted it and see just that. That shouldn't be up to...

Because you can't actually show me because I didn't do it. But I do applaud and support your decision to ignore me. And I guess to respond after the edit. It seemed to me other people were calling out SomeGuy just fine. I just thought it was ironic the way RangerBoo did it and pointed that...

But the screenshots do go to show that the intro isn't 100% just for the mood of the game since at least one part of it is backed up by the ending slides. So it seems to me that taller buildings surviving is at least implied in the original Fallouts, even if it's not particularly shown in the...

And I didn't have a problem with RangerBoo calling him out. But RangerBoo called him out by basically rolling in the mud right with him while condemning him for rolling in the mud. (To sort of use your analogy.) Something about that kinda tickled my fancy or something. (For lack of a better...

I'm not sticking up for him. I was pointing out how you made a post calling out attacks and insults and then you went on to attack and insult in the very same post. (And actually, I didn't really care so much about the insults on either side, it was exactly what I said about the irony of...

That's no excuse for bad behavior, or a lack of patience. Sure, it makes it a bit more understandable, but your own responses and how you conduct yourself are completely on you, just as his are on him. Bad circumstances aren't always going to excuse behavior. But like I said, I was just...

But it's still ironic either way to be calling somebody out for making insults, and then make insults of your own in the very same post. And kind of counterproductive too, right? So I was just remarking on that.

But can you really assume that the intro is 100% not indicative? And actually that place in the intro is the Necropolis apparently http://fallout.gamepedia.com/Necropolis Which is also shown in the ending slides. So I would still like to put forth the reason why it's not really shown...

I'd like to point out the slight irony here of somebody telling somebody else that they are the one that's going around attacking and insulting people, and then going right on in the same breath to insult and attack that person that they're making those claims against.

Yeah these days when there's one or more a year from the same series, there's definitely a quality hit and an over flooding of titles, so I agree with that.

I don't know, there's been a few first person shooters with some staying power. Granted they might be mostly older ones. But Goldeneye was around for a while. Half-Life, I've heard Counter-Strike, the original Halo was around for a while and at LAN parties and stuff even after some of the...

I'd say the intro is very much a part of the game. Since it's the intro, the introduction to the world space, it kinda sets up the world. Sure it's not in the playable game, but it is in-game. Obviously promotional material, and concept art, and cut content should be taken with a grain of salt...

Not half a handful, but half the people playing the games or half the gamers. It was a progression in numbers from small to medium to large. And at least some ballpark numbers, because if it was only a relatively handful of people demanding that change, even if it was constant, then that's...

But like how many people? Was it just a handful, was it half, was it more than that? Or was it just the publications clamoring for it? And if it was a majority, why didn't that reflect in the game series? (Though maybe you could make the argument that the spin-offs were to help satiate that...