Search results

Yeah, basic contract law. The document controls and gaps are filled with implied terms. One provision will not be interpreted to negate another provision of the same document, else why mention it? But, it's such a mess now anyhow, I'm not sure how professional their relationship will be...

I couldn't tell you. There might be a way, but I think it would be a lot of work.. Basic sounding functions can require a lot of background code covering every possible companion. For example, a method Obsidian used to solve one follow issue with companions was with this code to force it...

The way the game spawns many of the NPCs make this unlikely. For variety, rather than place an NPC, spawn markers are placed which spawn a TYPE of NPC from a form list. This helps populate areas with a variety of NPCs (male/female/race/etc.) without the Devs having to configure each one...

200 year-old irradiated Sugar Bombs.

Not really. Hypothetically a due process issue if you start saying you may change counsel X times, and you're stuck with inferior representation because you've changed too much. Though the judge can always make the decision if he feels it is for improper reasons.

Wait, you mean people at No Mutants Allowed are fans of Fallout? Looking forward to checking it out, maybe I will have completed my project by then. Maybe. I don't mind the delay, motivated me to learn the ins and outs of the geck.

Or at least into a fine red mist. I was disappointed the Desert Rangers weren't discussed more in NV but the Mojave Outpost reference was nice.

Yeah, I was mainly referring to NowGamer's take on it. At least, that's how I felt about O.A.

Yikes. Deju vu: sounds like a review for Operation Anchorage. Still plenty of time to throw out a Pitt or Point Lookout quality dlc.