Search results

Ah, but of course you won't be able to kill him. He features heavily in the storyline, remember?

Thanks for the help.

I couldn't find anything in the troubleshooting section, so I'll have to ask it here. The text is unreadable, maybe due to my LCD monitor. I don't know, but parts of characters disappear altogether, and others are too thin to be read. WTF?

The Codex.

:lol:

A story that is morally unambiguous but not about Good vs. Evil, and where you can take any side you want.

My point is, you can't just say "Yeah, the game has flaws", but not care about them, because they're never going to get fixed. And discussing those flaws should be very useful for Fallout-inspired games such as AoD or FMF.

And in Oblivion, you could also let yourself be killed and allow the Evil God to rule the world. OMG multiple endings.

All right, it was a story about a big neutrally who wants to save the world by taking over it. End result is the same. I still have to kill him. As I said, they could have done much more with a post-apocalyptic world.

Then, don't have the Radscorpion quest in the first place. The dynamite thing was too hard to figure out anyway, considering that most players probably didn't even know that dynamite existed in the game, or that it could be used in that way. And yes, many of those quests offered some choices...

Discuss.

True enough. I would add choices and freedom to those. But I don't consider SPECIAL to be an essential element. Maybe they wanted to have turn-based combat. Ideally, say that they decided that combat should play a minor role in the game, and real-time would only make it move faster, to allow...

Yes, and the entire game was based on the story of the Vault Dweller, the West Coast, the Master's plan, etc. Doesn't mean that Fallout 3 has to contain any of those elements. If Bethesda made a system that would be just as true to the spirit of Fallout as SPECIAL, it would be...

I love it how the change of the radiation logo is an allegory for the fate of Fallout - from classy but enjoyed by a select few, to ugly and dumbed down for the masses. :P

Unless DarkLegacy is some kind of authority in the field, I can't see where I havențt applied a argumentum ad verecundiam to myself, so your argument is both false and proves your illiteracy.

No, you're dumb. DarkLegacy's suggestions are actually reasonable. But let me quote some posts from the first page: Yep, the trefoil was a work of art and this new symbol is a piece of dumbed down crap for morons. What, do we want to protect idiots from radiation now? I doubt that this is...

DarkLegacy, wouldn't a skull atop the trefoil work better? The first version is too empty at the top. The second looks good though.

Well, I would agree with that. Myself, I'd think that a skull and a run away sign would work better, and that the trefoil is quite redundant. But I'm not going to say that the one they designed is stupid.

And it is quite clearly explained that the symbol was created for those who have no idea what radiation is or what the trefoil signifies. All the people on this site probably know the basics of radiation prevention, so their opinion is not that important. Not as much as that of the clueless...

It's a symbologist in non-native-english-speakerish.