Search results

I wonder if any of these jokers actually named Fallout as their favourite game in these dev profiles, since they are supposed to be such huge fans...

then again...what exactly remains of the original then, since we now have new laser rifles, new mutants, new power armor, new vault suits, new gameplay...basically a fresh version of everything, because bethesda need to add their spin to things...I don't like it...if I cared enough about this...

kinda looks like shit....in my mind the original Fallout looks way better, and should remain 2D...I'd like to see these kinda games with the detail of commandos 2...that would be sweet...

Pretty irrelevant info at this point for me...it's not like I can magically forget about the FP/RT console design...

How does this add up?...I bet oblivion was one of those exceptional, most anticipated rpgs...like evah...right?...right?!

Well, the question refers to Fallout 3...

Not for sneaking in...for delivering... Maybe you should consider why they felt the need to see the demo for themselves...obviously they didn't place much trust in mainstream gaming media previews...

All you people are ever arguing is how the game might turn out good and we shouldn't make premature judgements...but this is besides the point...the point is, Fallout 3 is shaping up to be a different kind of game, however good it may be, than the previous installments... So your argument...

We have yet to see, how much of the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. system actually remains intact...conversion to real-time eliminates or alters a lot of it's components...add to that their own stupidity, like the absence of low-intelligence dialogue or reducing targettable areas for aimed shots and you get the...

Thanks for that clarification...truly enlightening...

hopefully we'll get some decent looking Fallout mutants too, not that it matters at this point...still, it seems the game is pretty much done and the best they could come up with to showcase it is toilet drinking, bobble head power ups, mushroom clouds around every corner and... wtf??...I've...

I can't read Polish either...but the "nowa generacja role-playing" line doesn't sound like something we've not heard before... This is the Hungarian mag cover...comes with Disciples II, good game...

The guy's nick is 'robur'...

I would be interested in seeing those posts referring to every item on your list as part of the core design, since that is what you claimed. I doubt that. It is not entirely the same, the success of this game does not hinge on one person's abilities...Bethesda had the chance to hire at least...

Hah, I hope not...the basic idea was, if they drop the established, full descriptive title, we may as well assume it's part three in a line of shitty spin-offs...well that's streching it, but what else is left?

Your list is wrong, most of the items are not crucial to gameplay referred to as p&p tabletop rpg simulation. They help to establish consistency, though. Turn-based combat, SPECIAL, an ISO-like perspective and choice and consequences are most important.

I may be reading this wrong, but does this mean, this thing is not a sequel to 'Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game' and 'Fallout 2: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game' regardless what they paint it as? Or, to put it differently, if somehow, someone other, than Bethesda picks it up later...

Well...this is much more informative, than any of the overhyped previews. Go ahead and make the best game you can, Emil...I guess I can't feel bad about not buying it though...

Ahh, the irony...different indeed...

They do, what they do best...they do FP/RT best, they do Wiki style dialogue best...don't expect them to adapt, it's not what they do best...