Search results

ouch feargus... sadly my 'excitement for new vegas' has dropped another notch. i may just have to give up on the fallout series post 2.

holy crap! much thanks for your hard work, my good sir. looks like it's time for another play-through when i get home... perhaps in tandem with my play-through of arcanum. again, love your work!

holy son of a cracker! in all my years playing Fallout 2 i have never seen this.... looks like it's time for round 32934723.

uh, i think i missed the time travel in Fallout 2... when and where was this? i assumed it was cut out, yes?

and i also agree with you. every mmo i've played (trials only) seem to be devoid of good RPG mechanics. and nothing worse than just grinding for no real reason. interactivity with the worlds also seems fairly limited usually. however, he may be able to break that hideous genre. and while...

ah, another good interview chunk. does remind me i need to pick up arcanum on gog.com. while i do have various copies, ranging in age, of fallout 1 and 2, i do no longer have my arcanum copy. :( it's sad that there are few well thought-out games like these anymore.

i second that. it's like some retarded star wars shit.

oh josh, josh, josh... you didn't have to add bethesda because they are paying your wages currently. we all know that addition is a bald-face lie... and, at least, i hope he knows that.

yeah, if the assets are good, keep them. and if your team can add to it and improve the quality of the games using it. but... bethesda has proven they cannot do this.

sooo... they won't be using the same shitty voice actors from oblivion and "fallout" 3? excellent! though i don't know if a lot of dialog really matters, i always prefer games where i can read the dialog as opposed to it being said at me. and not to talk more about bioware, i think they...

you know, i was thinking (fearing) the same thing. i mean, they'd have to do little asset changes from "fallout" 3. and i know those lazy bitches would love that. hopefully todd howard doesn't visit this sight or he'll start "brain"-storming about this soon. and if he does, todd, me and...

haha, true. but it's only canon if you believe it... like U.S. revisionist history.

crap, i didn't know that... but i do live under a rock. what location did they want to do?

i've always valued content over graphics. i mean, wasteland, for one , has hideous graphics but great content, imo. and it seems like games that have "amazing" graphics lack any depth or content. oh, and i really hoped they would have finished van buren, i did like a lot of what would have...

argh... thanks for reminding me of how bethsoft raped poor harold. :( i do like the holodisks from fallout 1 and 2; yes, they were much better than those of "fallout" 3. seems like writing in games overall has taken a decline. brother none, i love the avatar. and i promise i won't kill...

aren't we? haha. but seriously, reviewers always seem like they've just skimmed a FAQ or wiki about the games themselves. and honestly, prior to "Fallout" 3, i never really met a lot of people who knew about the games whether in person (we're talking a total of 6 f***ing people) or online...

i've really enjoyed both of these and look forward to the third. ah, but that last bit is a little sad... as now poor fallout is in the hands of bethesda.

where to they hire these interviewers from? almost as bad as quips form the nightly news.

Fallout III: New Vegas?! ... Yes, Alpha Protocol was pretty damn good. I played it a lot, with a few playthroughs. Plus most of those bugs could be fixed by messing with the .ini file. And I was never a fan of Fallout 3 or how, IMHO, raped the canon of the game.

I do hate when some random narrator talks over top of these videos. And I do wish they would have removed the Fat Boy, however, if I'm really lucky maybe there is only one with extremely limited ammo locked away somewhere which is hard to get considering what it is.... but...