Search results

Just stop already. Its attitude like yours that ruined the games industry. Being satisfied with force fed factory line crap rather than games devs actually enjoy playing themselves. Sitting there and being pleased like a puppy to an abusive master is unproductive and nothing to boast about...

This is fine

Its for the people who want to roleplay but have no imagination, Bethesda games

People just claim games are too old for them to enjoy, yet enjoy artistic indie crap that isnt all that good with worse graphics. I think its just an excuse. If you gave a Bethout fan an old Fallout game with a modded-away title and told them it was an indie game or something they would play it...

Well, the slides could just say what happens ten years after the ending and on, yet drop the player off immediately after the ending, have the immediate effect be that factions you supported are more prevalent and certain side quests are shut off depending on your choices... That way you can...

Dark Souls count I think. Also, Mad Max was fun if a bit empty, and Shadow of Mordor was very good. Just Cause 3 had poor performance and an always online leaderboard thing so that was disappointing but the game is great. I think thats it, rarely any game focuses on the right things these days...

Hard West... Its has XCOM like gameplay but is more story based.... Short and a bit clunky but I thoroughly enjoyed what I've played of it so far. There's also a fair bit of actions you take having consequences in connected campaigns...

Head canon cant fix everything, much less Bethesda. They make the small details clear so you can't imagine your own lore bt make their own lore unclear so it doesnt tell us anything... Some games are beyond saving, some companies are beyond saving, lets leave it at that

They wanted to play into the pre war thing, Bethesda really doesnt like the post apoc, they want to do pre war stuff... Look at anchorage or the cast of mothership zeta, they want to do wacky scifi 50s chaos and Fallout 4 is as close as they can get to it, ugh

I see your point, but I don't think DAI was really isometric... It was supposed to be third person action but the community rightly complained about the lack of tactics in 2 so like the moneymaking morons they are they just stuff it in so people stop making criticisms... Its a crap attitude to...

Both aspects of the game were absolute trash, a personal story doesn't belong in Fallout, and having a four-way war plot when nothing really possesses a threat is pointless I mean what threat did the Institute actually have? They admitted they only want the nuclear device to work underground in...

You can make an ending that shows consequences too. There was a mod for NV that allows post ending gameplay with the faction you sided with in control of the mojave, but it got taken off for some reason... Theres no excuse for Bethesda dropping the ball here but DLC bait

I think Beth made all Fallout 4 endings result relatively the same so they can continue a sequel or DLC without having to work too hard... Classic Beth, no need to write a good story when you can just write 100 hours of sequel baiting

@ZigzagPX4, the professional corporate apologist. Defending these industries as a gamer is like being a anti-Nazi dissident defending Hitler in Germany. You can make all thr good points you want but its only going to bite you later. Hope you stay true to your word when games of the future...

Id say a lot of the issues are from Creation too, their Gamebryo 2.0 is not capable of making Mama Murphys design form that art concept work. Or it is but the performance takes a hit. I say the same for Vertibird concepts too...

Fallout 4 is in so many ways inferior to the complexity of Fallout 3 (I cant believe I just said that sh*t) that it cannot be considered better in any way. Even the combat overhaul people speak so nicely of doesn't seem all that overhaul-ish, but more like finally learning to rip off the right...

Or the glittering gem of hatred, or the FEV vats, or a puddle of vitriol, or the Brotherhood of Steel ...ok, I made the last one up, but you have to admit its accurate and sounds better.

Stop. Spare the pretentious bull. Your act of being a gamer who saw the light is not endearing, nor is your hostile sarcasm laced in every post you make. You have all the tone of a Bethesda fan condescending to people who appreciate better games. This site is what it is and people who see...

I liked his work in Dragon Age Origins more, but I agree that he does good work, not fitting for a Fallout game though, his efforts are being directed incorrectly, he should be working in other games that fit his composing style more, rather than making good work for a game his work doesn't...

Of course not, I said it did different things, it was a third person shooter meant to be satire and dark reflection on the nature of military gung-ho FPS like Call of Duty. Read up about it sometimes, it's considered an under appreciated piece of art in gaming culture, it was made to start off...