Search results

Arcanum : windows Jagged Alliance 2 : windows Wizardry series since VII - gold : windows I'm glad they're knowing that there are pcs, not consoles only.

No Arcanum, no Jagged Alliance, no Wizardry, no Krondor, no Daggerfall - but Oblivion and Morrowind. I'm surprised that Fallout is in such a list at all. Deus Ex wins? ROFL.

For the first time I wish to get a letter from Bethesda. :D

...and that's the reason why we've climbed the mountain of dullness in Oblivion finally, after the flaws of Morrowind and after Daggerfall. We're improving our dumb-down-system at every new botch, because we're these most creative types your mother always has warned you of.

They're going to make a teenie game to get a bigger audience, and when the ESRB says T, they'll say "Good news! We intended to make an M game, but ESRB has been generous." And for the same reason the official Fallout 3 forum is 13+. To develope an AO game no next gen is required - the target...

I can't see what's wrong with that. I wonder what this guy has expected in an official forum without any basic game informations. We love you for showing us nothing, Bethesda? A game with no elves inside is an indicator for a Fallout game, I assume. Fortunately the hype chorus of certain game...

These fees show they're going to rip off the customers.

So Bethesda was hoping for the project's cancelling, and when they realized that it's going to be released, they've pulled the emergency break.

A d20 PnP Fallout isn't part of the series. It's a spin-off at best case. So I'm not worried about it's quality at all. Same at the handy version of Fallout 0. Both are too far away from the series to bother me. And I can't see Bethesda's point here. How bad is Fallout 3, when they have to...

Agreed. A teaser that doesn't look like Fallout isn't a good omen. I think the heading for TEH GRAFIX is the reason. So they've made it more realistic, but less falloutic to avoid comments like "S.T.A.L.K.E.R. has much better graphics, FO3 isn't realistic at all..." And the more I'm looking at...

Important NPCs will respawn after a few hours. That's to prevent players from class-A-bugs in storyboard. So he will return and he will say all of his texts to you, and you will not be able to escape, no matter how often you try. And everytime you shoot him down you'll get an ingame movie clip...

So we'll have a father as a [x] narrator [x] mentor [x] tutor [?] questgiver [?] companion Weird. Here comes your new babysitter?

Where are the 50s? That doesn't look like Fallout. Must be another series.

Jeremy Soul sucks. I'd suggest - Pink Floyd"Atom Heart Mother"+Fats Domino - Kraftwerk "Radioactivity"+Bill Haley&the Comets - Birth Control "Gamma Ray"+Benny Goodman - Eric Burdon & War "Sky Pilot"+Satchmo - Manfred Man's Earth Band "Nightingales and Bombers"+Elvis

Most people know what kind of game they can expect from Bethesda. And that's the reason to insist on changes. The more, the better. A paying customer has the right to say what kind of stuff he wants. So I can see no reason to blame anyone. What's your alternative? Demanding a game style...

fixed.

Although I had expected a lot of negative comments, I'm overwhelmed by the hailstorm of trashing Beth has to take. Looks like the final stand of the victims of the "RPG of the Year" sometimes (which isn't related to your nick, Rosh. *g*).

Re: Why Bethesda needs Fallout like Vault 13 needs a Waterch I don't share that conclusion. If I look at current comments in game magazines or in the Beth forums, I read, that many people are expecting an Oblivion-like game, and so are the expectations of many of the current Oblivion fans...

Beth's audience or fake? In my eyes it's a satirical comment. Can't believe that there are such idiots.

...and produce more flops like StarTrek:Legacy? For heavens sake. Unfortunately one wrong idea can destroy a game. No one can screw like Beth, that's right.