Search results

Read this : quoted from >>here<< and remember : - Pete has given a number of interviews to xbox sites. - Todd's "Fallout 3 will be one of the ...most violent games ever" - Pete and Todd mentioned "Terminator" - And "We will do what we do best" So you can forget all about a "real...

argh - what a bunch of cocksucking morons. That's what I fear the most - the "great" Oblivion as a prototype for Fallout 3. If common expectations are going in that direction, great Fallout fan Todd will humbly satisfy such n00bish imaginations. Where the fuck is written that every game has...

Read Rosh's latest comment : http://www.rpgcodex.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=337764#337764

I'm waiting for some user made reviews. Stalker's theme is very interesting - but I'm not a great fan of first person shooters in real time. During the long years of developement some of the role playing parts have been replaced by action elements, and the "RPG" Stalker has turned more and...

Hypothetically the situation is they have to sell a game again, that doesn't match fans' expectations. And they know how to do that. Change of audience, console design with second line bad pc conversion, change of old fashioned non-action features and controls etc. Remember, there are a lot...

No, I didn't say such things. But why should they change their model for market success? There is no reason not to try the Oblivion coup a second time. Read Ashley Cheng's comments on Fallout 3 and Fallout fans - "We know you don't like current action RPGs, but times have changed blah blah -...

That's exactly the point. The FO3 situation is very different from the FOT situation - Bethesda has the great Oblivion with big sales and stupid content as an example for market success. There is no need to change this business policy. Dev's honour ? First that isn't a dev's decision any more...

Realism can prevent you from disappointment. Ok - let's speak about your constructive ideas: 1) Let's hope for the best 2) Let's wait until we're officially informed by Bethesda 3) Perhaps there is a possibility that one of the devs will lurk, and then this guy will recognize the great...

Even bad publicity is publicity. As long as you haven't played the game most people will not believe you - and then it's too late. Do you see any results from complaining on Oblivion or StarTrek:Legacy ? I do not. Bethesda's bad guys are bulldozing their way to console mainstream shit and will...

At last the debate has returned to NMA. But imo the matter here isn't how to get a decent Fallout 3, the matter is a question of guilt because FO3 will suck - if Roshambo's infos are correct. I fear they are. And if they are correct, it's ridiculous to assume, that a few weeks of late info...

OK - but people bought Fallout 1+2 not from Bethesda. It's not "their" series - there is no former Bethesda product, and Fallout 3 is both a beginning and a sequel. Do you mean the target audience for Fallout 3 is the same as for Oblivion? There is another rating - and old fans of Fallout are...

He mentioned Utima IV-VII - NOT the shitty Ultima VIII+IX. Todd knows what 'quality' means, I suppose. If you were true, he would mention Ultima VIII or IX as a evolution product of better game developement - but he didn't. The Ultima series shows how to run down a franchise by major changes...

Oh - "RPG of the year" Oblivion isn't good enough? I knew that already, but it's a nice confession. He didn't say "we make" - he'll "try to make" only. Hm, that isn't very complicated. And lookin' at Ultima -lol- well, I hope they'll learn a lot from Ultima VII.

:shock: Surprise, surprise. "Don't worry, be happy" - by Beth's Spiderman. But there is no proof for anything. 'Good old school graphics designer' or QA guy doesn't mean project leader of Fallout 3 - and good old school graphics guys have to do what Uncle Toddy is demanding. I don't...

Reminds me of 'One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest'. Seems to be the first test result of the new Terminator humour.

Right. But it shows that there was no leveled loot. ----edit---- Enemies of higher levels had some better equipment to drop. That was some kind of non directly leveled loot. Randomized treasures in dungeons were uneffected by level.

No. There was enemy levelscaling in Arena and Daggerfall, but it was decent scaling in lower range. Enemies in the randomized rogue dungeons had level scaling. There was no loot level scaling. There was randomized loot in both, Arena and Daggerfall - so I've found an Ebony Dai-Katana in the...

Obviously they like to feel bad.

hu? Very different from what? from Fallout1 and Fallout2? Arnold knows how to tell 12cal jokes. *grumble**grumble**grumble*

Bigger audience > more sales > more bucks