Search results

It WAS the Outer Worlds 2 trailer thread. lol

Lmao was TLOU2 THAT bad? I haven't touched a Naughty Dog came since Jak 3 and it's starting to feel more boastable... despite how autistic that sounds.

This is a pretty good critique, honestly. The issue with the Outer Worlds is in just how shallow and simple it can be. When you do compare it to NV, there is 0 competition. NV had various differing factions, all with their unique flaws and visions. Completing a quest in favor of the NCR in one...

No, marketing MATTERED. It does not matter now. Todd is an outright liar. It's not that he makes games that don't necessarily live up to the standards of their predecessors(though he does that too), it's that he straight up LIES... and is a poor game designer. That doesn't help either. The Outer...

??? And I'm saying that it's a bad idea because the way it was marketed was a bad idea. But the marketing occured like a year and a half ago or whatever so I don't give a shit about the marketing campaign. The game is the game and if someone is going to get the most out of it, they need to...

That's why I said that. lol

That's why I said that. That's fair. I'm just stating what their intentions likely were.

I viewed it as them taking the piss as much out of themselves as they are standard corporate trailers, which is the idea of Outer Worlds anyway. It's like the inverse of last time where they were trying to generate hype and then generated too much. I think they were trying a more self...

I think Outer Worlds is a good game, but it wasn't remarkable. It's worth a play, but don't expect, you know, Fallout. lol

The Institute allegedly had a plan. Just like how Bethesda allegedly made a Fallout game.

The lore reason is determination and the experience you gained, represented by your growing exp. The "luck" element is just the fact that stuff is always going down in the wasteland so naturally, you'll find things to do. It's not unique in that regard in comparison to any other RPG, really. A...

She doesn't have anything other than the name. Her business is dead and gone, and she knows it, despite Alice's inclination that she could be competition. The reason this is good isn't because of anything you do for Alice, but what you do for Cass. You convince her to essentially stop holding on...

Blade Runner 2049 was top tier. And I was a fan of the original.

My dream would be to take New Vegas's systems and nonlinearity and go further. New Vegas scratched the surface of a potentially even better game. Fallout 4 tripped over itself when trying, and Outer Worlds(I know it's not Fallout but just go with it) was just too thin due to the nature of its...

People get so preoccupied with alternate scenarios and lore detail that they don't seem to engage with the themes. It's more comforting for some to think about a fix all solution then to internalize the implications of massive human error.

James from Fallout 3 is like a Christopher Nolan protag. He does things for simple, if ideological reasons but doesn't have much depth outside of his noble altruism and family ties. Usually, that's ok because Nolan movies focus more on plot and concepts than character depth. But Fallout 3...

Bitter Springs was a red flag operation orchestrated by the secret Followers of the Apocalypse members who infiltrated NCR congress to take away everyone's plasma rifles. Also, Kimball's a lizard.

Did the Khans deserve it? Yeah, probably. Did the civilian children? No. Also, Native Americans is broad. You could argue some tribes were worse than others.

Imagine unironically praising Fallout 3 and 4's story. That's where screenrant is at. Imagine thinking Fallout being a shooter matters in judging its quality.

Either way, being sensitive isn't the same thing as being aggressively defensive. Big gap between "damn, I must admit that I am somewhat hurt sometimes" and *COMMENT REDACTED BY TGSPY*.