Search results

Indeed would I, along with all the other gameplay conventions that were lost and could've been conditioned to the new style. New Vegas could have been built for that... but it wasn't (and I don't blame Obsidian for that).

Yeah, it is very much workable. It needs more work towards the original form than what NV was able to give (not gonna go in detail on that here), but it can produce a good game (better than New Vegas). I don't believe it'd ever produce a sequel that could be considered "proper", but there is...

That's splitting hairs. Of course they would add their own touch to the game, things they think would work for the better, instead of simply producing an assembly line sequel (which is almost what they did). I don't think Josh means "aimed strictly to these folks and nobody else", but rather...

I don't think it's quite that black and white. It's "enough" of a copy/paste job to pass. Introducing few new (old) things and fitting them in doesn't really make Sawyer a hypocrite in this regard.

Yeah, they are really that different.

I liked that one. :D --------------------------------------- Here's another. I remember this being quite scary when I was a kid. I think the tagline was "Jaws on hooves". :D

I always felt otherwise. Same with Alien and Aliens. With both series', the first movies were more like rather minimalistic, but effective scifi horror flicks. The second entries, both by Cameron, went more towards a grandiose action spectacle (both great movies, but... kind of off in tone...

First digital game I played. Somewhere around '86 and '88 I think. It was my sisters game, but she didn't like it so I got it. We used to have competitions over who'll last longer. I still have it somewhere (or, I don't remember tossing it away).

I can't name a singular "best part". The old Fallout's were more like sums of their parts. It's not the lore alone, it's not the C&C and writing alone, it's not the character systems and gameplay or combat alone.... What made the classics classics was how well the parts played together and how...

No need to list me the differences. I know what they are. I’m just saying that the claim is perfectly reasonable when you look at the game as a whole (an easy sandbox shooter with some story and choice), even if it is not a wholesale copypaste job. Part of the Beth audience (as well as part of...

It does enough. The game is similiar enough in all ways that matter, while the obvious Obsidian touch is there (for better or worse for the Bethesda audience).

I don't. I haven't played it since 2009, and never will again.

Nothing older than the eighteenhundreds. I can't stand the ancient to medieval styled stuff anymore, it bores me to no end. I'd like to see a game taking palce during the late industrial revolution and early 20'th century.

Been tired for some time already. The series has no future as far as I'm concerned. I'll keep replaying the originals and hope that some day there'll be another series that picks me up the way Fallout did, if not for two+ decades, at least for a while. The funny thing is, though, things seemed...

Ok. The Gamespot interview just killed it for me. Maybe when it's on sale...

I found the trailer a bit lame, unexciting and generic. The dude who'll probably be our protagonist sounds awful and will be a pain to listen to through the game, and secondly it gave a pretty strong scifi GTA vibe. That's already two things to check from my "I don't want to see" list... a...

Could be potentially interesting. I'm just not sure if I can bother with bashing zombies and gangers as a chief draw of the game.

Cheery. I'm not really a fan of that sort of music, but I didn't turn it off since the chorus is somewhat catchy. Let's give a solid 6/10.

That's how I understood it. An attempt to underline - as a tangent - that he does like the original form of Fallout, so as to not be labeled simply as a bethtard, and from thereon that he thinks 4 does what it does better than NV since the games are mechanically and conceptually comparable...