Search results

Sorry i'm still learning! i'll work on that. and i agree that he's acting in bad faith and misrepresenting certain arguments in his video and its pretty frustrating.

Ive seen this said a lot but I've never been able to verify it myself. but thats certainly what it feels like in the game itself. there's a lot of instances where being set 20 years after the bombs fell seems like the perspective of the backgrounds. but ive yet to see anything that confirms this...

ah my bad then thats a valid point.

there's nothing wrong with using the same argument as someones else if that argument is a good one. repeating an argument doesn't invalidate that argument. but i agree with you that the arguments themselves are flawed

eh i wouldn't say he doesn't understand media criticism because he does make some good analysis videos. i think the problem comes from his idea that he has to be "fair" to fallout out 3 by finding something good to say about it regardless of what he actually thinks. but ultimately it ends up...

Idk if id call him a shill. he strikes me more as the type who doesn't like gate keeping, so he enables the group that wants to present a false narrative. the ones who preform a bunch of mental gymnastics to defend fallout 3's world building