Search results

Oh God, I had completely forgotten about those. Also, I don't think I ever noticed that face as part of the building. Looks kind of out of place, especially with the hair. But you're right, it can be done, I was just thinking what a nightmare it would be. Then again, these people are...

Then let's consider that means ARGUMENT OVER. Back on topic: While the environment for Fallout 3 hasn't been perfect (I agree with lisac2k on the 5.5 thing), I can imagine how hard it is to do Fallout-style sci-fi retro 50s in 3D. To me, it always worked in Fallout because it was 2D...

Sure seems like the wave of PA games is because of F3. Feast or famine, eh? As for Halo, it was decent for what it was: a shooter. The only thing about Halo was that the controls worked well (first time I've ever seen on a console) and the story was marginally interesting (if completely...

Yes, but there is such a thing as too cutesy. Some of the Terran structures look like they belong in a Bomberman game. EDIT: I was thinking Megaman actually.

I was reading the most excellent article about F:PoS on DaC the other day, and all I could think about was how Chucky easily sounded like one of the Bethesda devs (especially now that I think about the nuke catapult. At least we didn't get that before.). But of course, I think that's an insult...

I'm always on the lookout for new games (who isn't?), and in my travels, I stumbled upon Allegiance. Now apparently, this game was an actual retail game at one point, released by Microsoft even, but had too many problems with hackers and not enough advertising. The game didn't sell very...

If only Firefly could have the same success.... Good news regardless.

Whew, that's a mouthful. It's a nice collection. Would make some nice Fallout loading screens (hint hint).

Also, I forgot to mention something: does anyone see a parallel between Blizzard releasing Starcraft 2 after Supreme Commander, just like they had Starcraft come out after Total Annihilation? And even though Total Annihilation is/was the better game, being much more strategically and...

So, it looks like Blizzard has announced Starcraft 2. And yes, it's an RTS. Slashdot does a decent job summing up the facts, and there's two blogs on the subject already in motion: one on 1Up and one on IGN. The details are pretty sketchy so far, but it's good to see that Blizzard's at...

Sorry, but that line just strikes me as very funny.

Well, looks like Beth is taking a leap of faith here. There's a couple lines that made me laugh in one thread, one which was already pointed out by dev. Does this guy even care if Beth maintains the original feel? Also, how well Beth did on an action FPS with stats has no direct effect...

Now that you mention it, it just looks like a glorified Source mod. Hell, those creatures in the last screen even look like headcrabs.

Am I the only one who caught the reference to MGS in the Metal Armor illustration?

It should be mentioned that the demo has a much play-ability: You can play a full game, with bots or online/LAN, with two other people. The only thing you don't get it the ability to change game modes (which really aren't that different). And if you do like it, you can purchase it online and...

I don't think they're debating. I think they're just giving their own answer for each question. I could be wrong, but that's the impression I got.

Didn't your school teach you about duck and cover? They don't need a shelter with a table that big.

An organization known as Dropping Knowledge will be holding an event they call the "Table of Free Voices" on September 9. What is it? More interesting is this: *Bold mine. Offical site: http://www.droppingknowledge.org/bin/dk?ph=projects

Gamespot has a news thing about publishers' and developers' reaction to the change in E3. The only interesting answer was from Ken Levine: Full article here.

http://www.llbbl.com/data/RPG-motivational/page_01.htm Some of them aren't all that great, but there are some gems in there.