Search results

I'm not a fan of tabletop roleplaying, either, by the way. If I want to "roleplay" with real people, I'll go outside and talk to someone. Maybe build up a few strength points in the gym. Now enough of this damn tangent. >.< By "it's," I meant "Fallout 1+2," NOT tabletop whatever. The original...

301. Liam Neeson will never stop being type cast. When I read in an interview that Bethesda had written the role "specifically" for Neeson, I already knew that he would be a kind-hearted father figure. 302. No matter what you focus on in life, you will always end up being perfect at...

It's still roleplaying, regardless of the format.

It makes no difference, you missed his point. All RPGS have roleplaying, by definition. In all forms of roleplaying games, restricted scenarios are good. Otherwise, the game only rewards you for how much time you put into it, and your decisions are immaterial (see WoW and Fallout 3). :clap:

That's wierd. This is a forum for a Post-Nuclear Roleplaying game. Restrictions make for great RPGs for a few reasons: one has to put effort in developing a unique character and skillset, and has to make choices during the game as to what one chooses to see and do. It also adds replayability...