Search results

i think it can but id like to see players punished more by their stats. if you have low gun skill, maybe your pistol jams up a little more frequently or you have a super slow reload or something? im hesitant to say to make it like CoD or other luck-based twitch-shooters, but some of those games...

i bought both on steam because they were on crazy sale

baldurs gate is really fun as a co-op. one of the first ps2 games i played with my dad. nothing beats the tag-team dungeon crawl

yeah in a lot of places it isnt the bomb blast that kills you, it's the oxygen being forcefully ripped from your lungs to fuel the fire that will disintegrate your body

this is, in essence, the theme of the fallout games (the originals at least): how absurd it is that, after torching the world in the name of war, our first reaction would be to pick up weapons and start killing each other, stealing from each other, and trying to gain power through war, death...

fallout works well in fps mode but only if the story is good. i mean, they at least changed the vats so that it only slows time instead of freezing the game, and if they learned from NV hopefully there will be more dynamic story choices. it will probably never be as rpg-perfect as the classic...

that sound unreal and i need it now. i was never one for fried twinkies or oreos or anything but i cannot pass up fried cheese curds or cheese fries. ill eat them both until im absolutely sick.

youuuve never had deep-fried cheese curds Wisconsinite chiming in

Kony 2012

these are all good points, but eventually factions and civilizations would form. they'd start as little clans protecting eachother from outside threats, they'd specialize jobs, and eventually have a tiny settlement on the face of the wastes. bottle caps made sense to tie in with the time-period...

i get what you're saying but those places still have guns, just not in the hands of the people. so, as was already said, the people who cannot arm themselves quickly enough will likely not make it very long. i mean, if you have an egg and your neighbor has a pig and a gun, your neighbor is gonna...

why would we want a dynamic game? where's the fun in player choices? :roll:

Ian had a lot INT skill obv. i just dont think it should be too hard to make companions not kill themselves (at their own fault) without making them immortal. like, they shouldnt blindly run into turret fire or landmines that YOU placed (coughcough dogmeat) but i expect them to die if they are...

It sounds like you want a game where, no matter what your choice of faction is, you get the same gameplay every time. FO3 is perfect for you

Where they only have you go to that building for the purpose of that quest and theres no other reason to even be there ever. Yeah

no, somehow worse. FO3 dogmeat always running through my freshly-placed mines and killing me or skyrim companions running headlong into combat while i tried to sneak behind the dungeon boss for an assassination. i mean, sure ian shoots you point blank in the back of the head, and he might use...

dogmeat confirmed badass

this plus with various, distinct gangs you can give them all more unique weapons/armor/fighting styles/ hideouts and whatnot. im sick of the painstake armor+hunting rifle bullshit. i want to see a gang that uses janked-out power weapons that occasionally misfire but they think they're badass...

jive black faction like the kings in freeside? id be down

I really want chicago but that's because im from the midwest and chicago is a pretty cool place. i think they could do a lot with it.