John Rambo is ...

Z

zioburosky13

Vault Senior Citizen
full of gore,
blood splatting,
kicking and slapping woman,
child killing,
man get blown into chunky bits of red meat,
half the skull gets shredded by a .50 caliber,
child molester,
war in jungle,
missionary trip goes SNAFU,
lot's of chopping,
pig eating man,
nuke-size claymore explosion,
gruesome death that makes Texas chainsaw massacre like sesame street.


Best R-rated movie in 2008. ;)
 
It's the 26th of January.

If it's out, it's probably the ONLY R-rated movie in 2008.

:roll:
 
Did he improvise an explosive device with his walker and colostomy bag? He's like 7 million years old now. He'd probably be more lethal if they let him keep his driver's license for a few more years and build an Old Country Buffet about 20 minutes from his house.

I feel this way about Harrison Ford as well. The next Indy movie should be called 'Indiana Jones and the Quest for Medicare Part B'.
 
JohnnyEgo said:
Did he improvise an explosive device with his walker and colostomy bag? He's like 7 million years old now. He'd probably be more lethal if they let him keep his driver's license for a few more years and build an Old Country Buffet about 20 minutes from his house.

I feel this way about Harrison Ford as well. The next Indy movie should be called 'Indiana Jones and the Quest for Medicare Part B'.
Click to expand...

:rofl: ,
The Vault Dweller
 
I wanted this as my sig but it couldn't fit. Still, I have to say it:
The craziest thing about Rambo is not the endless ammo or logic-defying action.

It's the naming.

The first movie was called First Blood. Ok, that works.
The second was called Rambo: First Blood II. Maybe that should read First Blood II: Rambo, but whatever.
The third one suddenly wasn't a First Blood anymore and was just Rambo III.

Now this is Rambo. That means the sequel could be Rambo II. But the sequel to that can't be Rambo III, because that already exists, so the sequel would have to be called Rambo IV: First Blood III.
 
Agreed with Johnny-

John Rambo is...
-Too old for this crap
- needs to find a nice chair and take a nap
- needs to learn a new hobby- shuffleboard?
- should consider those cruises for retired folks
 
Yeah, he's not young anymore. Very observant of everyone.

Kindy funny though... complaining about Sylvester Stallone being "too old" for an action movie, yet I bet he could still kick the ass of anyone here.

But anyway, is that really a valid point of contention? How about, I dunno... worrying about what's good/bad about the movie, or his performance?
 
I quite like movies about old guys who kick ass. Don't know why.

So, anyone want to review it without spoilers?
 
maximaz said:
So, anyone want to review it without spoilers?
Click to expand...

Um, it's Rambo. I really don't know how to review it or spoil it. Just see it with your buddies and put your brain out to graze.
 
I swear to Christ Fandango listed the movie as being fifty-nine minutes long.
 
Shallow? Yes.

Storyline as an afterthought? Yes.

Ultra violent? Yes.

Evil badguy who's like ultra scum for no apparent reason? Yes.

Mad props to 61 year old Stallone for showing the younger generations how an action movie should be made.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top