Made a song, dl and say what you think!

keyser Soeze

Where'd That 6th Toe Come From?
I made this (Neo) Classical song in Fruity Loop the other day.

Im pretty new to it so don't expect to mutch :roll:

But im pretty pleased with it.

Download here and say what you think!
 
I just got a error when I tried to download it, got stuck at 92% and it just wont restart can you post it some ware else? I would really like to listen to it.
 
Wooz said:
"Neo classical"?
I'm no history expert, but most people who use the term seem to refer to newly written orchestral works. Although that isn't sufficient to describe neoclassicism, '20th century, classic-inspired' music often meets the term. It's often used kind of like how people who say they like 'classical music' often just mean they like orchestral music. While 'classical music' is a term often used to simply describe 'orchestral music', it is in its more detailed definition a particular period of time in musical development roughly attributed to the 18th and 19th centuries. "Neo classical" music would be newly written (or at least, after the classical period) orchestral music "inspired by" the classical period, but to what extent isn't obvious. To label something as 'neoclassical' thus doesn't say at all as much about a work as other conventional labels. Famous composers to some extent attributed to the neoclassical 'style', or time period, would include Stravinsky, Shostakovich, Orff, Hindemith, Bartók, etc.

As for the composition, keyser Soeze: Not to be mean, but it's boring. Repetative, completely bereft of interesting harmony, not including any contrapuntal finesse, with lame 'melodies' and lacking a theme. The whole thing is like a way too long intro that just won't end. The 'violins' were especially poorly written. When they came in, I thought they maybe could save the day by instantly doing *something* to lead the piece onto the way into the realm of interesting, but they never did.

Do you know all about intervals? For future development, assuming that you do for it is crucial, I would recommend learning how to do accurate counterpoint pieces based on cantus firmus. It's boring as hell and more 'math' than 'music', but very helpful. After that you can use that knowledge to compose counterpoint works leaving the ancient rules behind and opening for creativity. For the most part, I tend to see the harmony as a consequence of the counterpoint, but knowledge about harmony is naturally also essential in order to be able to construct interesting and counterpoint compatible melodies. Then you should read up on form.

Counterpoint! Harmony! Structure!
 
Thx for the consctrucitv criticism Luxor.

Its one of my first songs. I don't expect to be mozart in one day :D

Yeap its kinda repetitive. Should make some sort of lead rhythm that isn't together with the background.

I would recommend learning how to do accurate counterpoint pieces based on cantus firmus.

Do you know some place where i can learn more about this?
 
keyser Soeze said:
Do you know some place where i can learn more about this?
The best way to learn counterpoint is obviously to have a teacher who can point out your mistakes instantly. If that's not possible, I guess I'd consult a music litterature store and try to find someone who knows what they're talking about when recommending a book on the subject. On the internet, I don't know. I skimmed through wikipedias article on Counterpoint that mentions strict counterpoint and cantus firmus, but noticed that it's flawed on many accounts. It's good enough to give you a general idea of what it is, but not as a resource to teach you how to actually produce something accurate. There are probably some websites with good enough courses, but which ones, I don't know.
 
Back
Top