Search results

:mrgreen:

Lol, they don't have shadows XD An action game without shadows is like... Fallout 3 XD

Darklands. And that's about it. :)

Too much red in this game. What's up with them? And too much dark, just like in Fallout 3's promotional art. I'm not expecting much from their art department...

It's just too unlikely anyone will ever see a kick-ass fallout game. Unless the rights go leftright, in which case we'll see a few indie studios having their shot a it.

Even Mass Effect is a better shooter than Crysis.

I hear a space helmet called Death Helmet that makes you look like a droid and sound like a computer will increase your speech skill too.

Considering Fallout 3 is basically Oblivion 2, it would fall far from the truth. Most teams could do something very similar without a lead.

They may wanna fix the repair mechanics... Since they are creating mods and all...

I think playing the original game for half an hour should be enough for that, no need for death valley,

Fallout 3 defies all logic. Battery cells powering lamps inside abandoned metro tunels. GAS GENERATORS working 200 years after a nuclear war that happened because there was no gas. 200 year old standing wooden houses. Medical supplies and food all around (not to mention weapons and ammo) and...

Indeed. Notepad looks fantastic.

Noup. Where are the shadows on that?! God...

I don't like the artistic direction. But the graphics are good. Again, if the console version is the "normal" version of the PC, then a reasonable Dx9 VGA should handle the game. It's either badly optimized, or artificially heavy to make people buy more expensive VGA. Because there really...

The game is out for the 360. Any reasonable DX9 VGA should play the game no problem. Unless, of course, its graphical quality is much better on the PC.

Nobody.

I didn't say it required DX10! I said it requires a DX10 VGA. You can play it in Windows XP, only you have to have a DX10 VGA. What VGA do you have?