Looks like they launched in the wrong region. Or should have launched with a monster hunter game.
They were thinking that the iPad is wildly popular and cool so let's have a system that uses and iPad for a controller! Having games use DSes as controllers is a far better idea but neither is good.TorontRayne said:What is Nintendo thinking with that Wii U crap? It looks awful. I love Nintendo but holy shit am I unimpressed.
The PS2 was far better, it was that little gray box plus MORE. Both systems are loaded with great games and it marked the end of the console Renaissance for me (the NES or SNES was the start)..Pixote. said:I loved Sony at the time they released this little gray box
That's because Nintendo offers a solid product that is friendly to third-party developers. If they bothered to woo more third-party developers for their consoles they'd be in a much better place. The N64 was their downfall with the GameCube putting the nails in the coffin, they need to rekindle interest. It wouldn't hurt anything of Nintendo of America went through a reorg.Kilus said:Looks like they launched in the wrong region. Or should have launched with a monster hunter game.
sea said:Pretty much.TheWesDude said:isnt the AMD 7 series GPU like 5+ generations ago?
Not really a surprise - it's a bit more powerful than an Xbox 360. Frankly I don't care much about graphics at all these days, so long as a game looks clean and is nice and smooth and playable, but... well, there are two outcomes.
The first one is that developers stop making good games for the WiiU and keep giving it awful, awful ports or poor-quality spin-off titles, i.e. same as the Wii is today. The only good games will be made by Nintendo which means that players will be starved for content as has been the case for the last 10+ years.
The second one is that developers will realize that budgets for creating content on the competition's next-gen consoles will be too high to be sustainable, and so will welcome the chance to develop games at "low" budgets of "only" $30-50 million. The WiiU won't be the most graphically impressive out there, but it might have the support of developers who don't have the financial backing to spend $100 million on their games just to make them look like an Unreal Engine 4 tech demo.
Will be interesting to see what happens, because honestly it could go either way at this point.
Sub-Human said:I don't think $100 million is right. $30-50 million is probably too much for a modern game, the highest ranking ones go at about $20 million I believe.
For a developer team of 10 people, using pre-made Unity sprites and having already managed to work on the story/background for a year, I think $3 million is more than enough. Remember, they've asked for just 1 in the beginning, meaning if they can deal with that, 3 million is more than enough.
sea said:Keep giving it awful, awful ports or poor-quality spin-off titles, i.e. same as the Wii is today.