Fbos Preview

Odin

Carbon Dated and Proud
Admin
Gamesfirst! have previewed Fbos at this years E3, where the reviewer talks about what he remembered of Fallout 2 and Tactics and compares it to Fbos. Here's a quote:<blockquote> It remains to be seen whether or not Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel contains the same humor, but if they can pick up in the strand that Fallout 2 left off, Brotherhood will be worth playing not only for the action, but for the laughs as well.</blockquote> What's strange is that he doesn't much talk about the story in the game, guess it doesn't matter eh?
Link: Fbos Preview @ Gamesfirst!
 
Vanity preview.

Vanity preview.

The only 'thing' that matters in this review is the slacker that authored this self indulgent ""BIG ADVENTURE"" at the 2003 E3.

Wonder if it's all a figment of naval fixated, dillusional angst.
Wonder if this "personna loser" exists and actaully went to E3 to bully innocent strangers.
Wonder if the "loser" actually played the FOBOS demo.
Wonder if the 'fractured fiction' actually played any FO.

Do know that in his truncated mind , ""it's all "" about him.

This the type of jounalism that FOBOS attracts....
wonder if there's some justice.....no matter my cosmology of the moment.


4too
 
Oh yes, absolutely. I can remember playing Fallout all those times because the weapons are just so friggin' cool.

Just what the hell is a "closed-road pathway" supposed to be anyway?
 
i don't know, but it sounds like "linear gameplay". it doesn't make a lot of sense, though. firstly, Fallout was never particularly linear, secondly, only a narrow-minded fool who doesn't know jack about role playing games would like one game's linearity.
 
Ego, or major fuck-up, you decide:

GamesFirst! prides itself on being the most well-written game review sites on the web. But don't just take our word for it; the site has won tons of awards. So without further ado, here's a brief history of the awards we've managed to garner thus far.

When you have to boast about the awards you get and many of them are of a wide category nature of many different kinds of sites, then it pretty much means that they got the award due to an unrepresentative sample.

In addition, the article writer is a Grade A Twit. The rampant idiocy was too obvious, but here's a recap:

Baldur's Gate has a TB gameplay?
F:POS had a walk-by preview?
He believes that the saturation of easter eggs and pop-cuture references are what makes up a portion of Fallout.
And more that shows this kid has no clue about game design or Fallout.

Even his made-up terms are illogical in themselves:

Fallout was one of the first games to offer what I call closed-road plotting, meaning that your actions or inactions directly affected how you could play the game.

That's called role-playing, moron. Funny, isn't it, since it's a role-playing game.

In such a usage, "closed-road" would lend to mean a linear plotted storyline like the Final Fantasy games. "closed-road" and "open-ended" tend to mean the exact opposite. Perhaps if My First Job Is McDonalds bothered to think a little bit, he would have come up with concepts like "non-linear", or to use somewhat of his terminology, "open-road".

For a senior staff member, he certainly does well to present the site as ignorant beyond belief.
 
i just went to Gamesfirst! site, because i wanted to post a comment about the FOBOS preview on their feedback page. guess what i found out? they have NO feedback page! they are either afraid of getting terrible feedback for their lame articles or they figure so few people read them that nobody would even bother to post comments. i personally prefer www.game-revolution.com. they don't have many articles, but those they have are high-quality, objective and humorous. plus game-revolution also has a good forum and a chat.
 
Back
Top