Courier said:High ammo consumption rates, low accuracy, low range, and useless against armored enemies means that SMGs aren't really worth it. I find it's better to sell them to vendors and buy a rifle instead.
Courier said:High ammo consumption rates, low accuracy, low range, and useless against armored enemies means that SMGs aren't really worth it. I find it's better to sell them to vendors and buy a rifle instead.
James Snowscoran said:The 10mm SMG, which shows up early in the game, has better dps that any pistol or non-DLC rifle.
Courier said:That's exactly why I don't like them in NV, they have high DPS but low DAM. DPS is only good against unarmored enemies, and how many unarmored enemies do you meet exactly?
Actually, being unarmored just makes rifles and other high DAM weapons more effective, so there's never really any need to use a high DPS weapon.
Stanislao Moulinsky said:Courier said:That's exactly why I don't like them in NV, they have high DPS but low DAM. DPS is only good against unarmored enemies, and how many unarmored enemies do you meet exactly?
A lot, actually. Almost all the enemies that aren't:
-NCR
-Legion
-BoS
-Deatchlaw
-Large Radscorpions
are unarmored/very lightly (5<) armored.
Firearms are more effective than melee/unarmored weapons so they are bad too? I think you are missing the point of the game...
Courier said:No, melee and unarmed weapons have the advantage of not needing ammo. It's just that if you've got a bullet that can be used in either an automatic weapon or a rifle, you're better off using it in the rifle. It's killing one enemy with two shots, as opposed to killing one enemy slightly faster in ten shots.
I'm not missing the point of the game, there are weapons that are more effective than others. I'm not going to waste ammo with automatic weapons just for the hell of it, that's almost as stupid as the people who pretend they're guards in Oblivion. If one weapon is useful on all enemies and another is useful on a very narrow niche who are still easy to fight with the first weapon, then I'm going to pick the first weapon.
Edit: Just like I'll never use mines, because there's never really any need to. I might carry one or two around just in case, but there will probably never be a time in the game where they could kill someone more effectively than my other weapons.
Courier said:And how many people do you find that don't fall into those categories? Unless you're having a really hard time fighting fiends or powder gangers, you don't really need automatic weapons.
No, melee and unarmed weapons have the advantage of not needing ammo.
I'm not missing the point of the game, there are weapons that are more effective than others. I'm not going to waste ammo with automatic weapons just for the hell of it