Starwars said:http://www.oxm.co.uk/viewer.php?mode=article&id=12563
Info coming February it seems. Can't believe that it actually says that the game is Bethesda's though. Kinda disrespectful.
Looks like Fallout 3 screenshot with Vegas sign.
Starwars said:http://www.oxm.co.uk/viewer.php?mode=article&id=12563
Info coming February it seems. Can't believe that it actually says that the game is Bethesda's though. Kinda disrespectful.
I was actually going to mention that games should look into having a battle track to compliment every area's score so that there would be less clashing, but I completely forgot to mention it. Of course the "flaw" with this idea is it's more expensive because more music has to be commissioned. That said, I think that battle music would be great if it were like that.Ausdoerrt said:Still, quality of music is the defining factor. Also variety, look at Last Remnant - there's a good 15 "combat music" tracks depending on area or how well the battle is going.
Pretty much par for the course for the idiots at OXM. They are up there on the list of worst gaming publications.Starwars said:http://www.oxm.co.uk/viewer.php?mode=article&id=12563
Info coming February it seems. Can't believe that it actually says that the game is Bethesda's though. Kinda disrespectful.
Crni Vuk said:Does anyone remember the very first Fallout 3 teaser ? Boy I cant believe how ... hyped I was for Fallout 3 after that video. But when I think what we got now ... urgh I feel so dirty >_>. Damn Bethesda!
Starwars said:Todd has always annoyed the hell out of me in previous interviews and stuff but I thought he was pretty good to listen to here.
I just think that both him and Pete are horrible public speakers who always sound like nerdy idiots (Narutards was an example that came quickly to mind, but I'd say they sound more stupid than nerdy). I really think that they either need to send them to seminars/speech classes or hire someone whose good at public speaking.Starwars said:Todd has always annoyed the hell out of me in previous interviews and stuff but I thought he was pretty good to listen to here.
I wouldn't be surprised in the least if it's neutered but I expect the writing quality to be, at the very least, reasonable. I also expect that the ideas will be, on average, a little less stupid and higher quality writing helps better disguise such things and makes people more forgiving (right or wrong).sarfa said:Just remember that he and his ilk at Bethsoft have a fair degree of control over what goes into NV. Don't believe for a second that Bethesda will use a loose leash just because Obsidian have a better understanding of what made the series good.
I honestly think Beth is too busy with TESV to mess with Obsidian too much. TES is their original series after all.Ausir said:Of course they won't purposefully tell them to make the game worse. But they might tell them to change things so that it's better for them and their target audience, but worse for us.
Ausir said:Of course they won't purposefully tell them to make the game worse. But they might tell them to change things so that it's better for them and their target audience, but worse for us.
Considering how they neutered various parts of Fallout 3 for various parts of the world, despite there being no good reason to, I highly doubt they'll be hands off in terms of content.OakTable said:I honestly think Beth is too busy with TESV to mess with Obsidian too much. TES is their original series after all.
UncannyGarlic said:Considering how they neutered various parts of Fallout 3 for various parts of the world, despite there being no good reason to, I highly doubt they'll be hands off in terms of content.OakTable said:I honestly think Beth is too busy with TESV to mess with Obsidian too much. TES is their original series after all.