The female side of George Bush (warning- it may shock you)

welsh

welsh

Junkmaster
wgirl0071.jpg


wgirl0041.jpg


For more- http://www.randomdudes.com/bush/bush.html

When he gets those menstral cramps, he invades another country.
 
dude, that is really horrible.
i mean he is the most made fun of US president.

Not that I mind :)
 
Paladin Solo said:
No, it's because he's not a kiss-ass.
Click to expand...

Yeaj! :roll:

Roosevelt, that was "not a kiss-ass". Did he get ridiculed (aside from being called "the red man in the white house")? Not much.

Bush gets ridiculed mostly for stating the facts wrong or using wrong English.

It's like our old premier, Wim Kok. Once, during a conference with Chirac (of France), after Chirac explained his position, Kokkie said "La meme pour moi" to state he agreed. However, that statement is normaqlly made when you want to order the same as your companion in a restaurant. Ooops
 
Kharn said:
Paladin Solo said:
No, it's because he's not a kiss-ass.
Click to expand...


Bush gets ridiculed mostly for stating the facts wrong or using wrong English.
Click to expand...



That's mostly right. I saw a webpage that made me laugh to tears :). It was about a dialogue between Condie Rice and g.w.bush.

I hafta give a link.


It was here somwhere...
 
True, but they're not the leader of the world's strongest nation
Click to expand...
No, he is the leader of the strongest nation in history. Dumbass.

Is it just me, or do you kina want the *smartest* possible person running a country?
Click to expand...
No, you want the person the people (or, arguably in this case, the system that works for the people) choose. I dont care if you are the most intellgent, best suited person for the job in history and could rule forever. The purpose of government is to work for the people by mandate, and if the people are not satisfied, then the government serves no purpose.
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
True, but they're not the leader of the world's strongest nation
Click to expand...
No, he is the leader of the strongest nation in history. Dumbass.
Click to expand...
I think you mis-interpreted him, he was referring to what Big_T_UK said. night monk3y was simply stating that most of the people who mis-pronounce the word Nuclear are not the leader of the USA.

EDIT: and yes, I suppose leadership is not the same thing as intelligence, but Bush? Lets get someone who doesn't shit in the face of the god-damned UN by invading a country that didn't even have WMD. But thats another debate.
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
True, but they're not the leader of the world's strongest nation
Click to expand...
No, he is the leader of the strongest nation in history. Dumbass.

Is it just me, or do you kina want the *smartest* possible person running a country?
Click to expand...
No, you want the person the people (or, arguably in this case, the system that works for the people) choose. I dont care if you are the most intellgent, best suited person for the job in history and could rule forever. The purpose of government is to work for the people by mandate, and if the people are not satisfied, then the government serves no purpose.
Click to expand...

Indeed, but that assumes
(1) the social contract
(2) that the social contract is actually working.

I actually am rather suspicious of the first as more than a philosophical idea. Perhaps through the development of democratic norms, but even that I doubt.

Which raises the question of funding and special interest. What matters more, the popular will or the funding and special interest support that can channel popular support? And if there is a clash between the two (popular will vs special interest), which will prevail and why?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top