So if money is stolen from me and mine, and I use something that was created by this stolen money, I'm the parasite? Interesting.
Tell me, where is the difference by the government taking the money from you to provide you with an infrastructure that you use most probably daily. And paying corporations to do pretty much the same job, but for more money, while offering most of the time less quality.
The reality is, you end up paying either way, unless your plan is to live in the woods as self sufficient hermit.
Quote:
Paris: local authorities regain control of water management
(...)
The newly elected team were quick to realise that there was total lack of any control over the “delegation” of public sector services, as well as of the provision of services. There was a serious lack of financial transparency, and no control over any work that was carried out.
(...)
Is public management necessarily more virtuous than private?
It is too soon to be able to carry out any evaluation, as the public system has only been operating since January 1st 2010. But it is possible to observe some of the initial advantages of being under public management. Firstly, it is important to underline the big profits that the reform has produced; this money is totally reinvested in the water services. These initial profits are an estimated 35 million euros per annum, if not more. What are the main reasons for this? It is the result of internalising of the profits that the private operators were making. We have public competitive calls for tender for work that was previously handed out to subsidiaries of the major groups that overcharged for carrying it out. We are making the most of a public accounting system. There is no need to pay dividends to shareholders and to set aside part of the profits generated by the water services to pay them. All the revenue from the provision of water services is totally reinvested in the service, and there is complete financial transparency, unlike the previous situation under the private system, where the lack of financial clarity was repeatedly criticized in financial controls.
This idea of corporations run by the people for the people is neat, but it's utopian. And ignoring human nature completely.
You can not run a whole nation just with corporations. Because even corporations benefit heavily(!) from a state with a government. Particularly when you consider how often they end up in curts or dealing with ilegal bullshit by competitors.
*Edit
And I am not saying the government should run EVERYTHING. Free enterprises have to exist and it has to be possible. But when it comes to matters that touch the public as whole? Like fire fighting, water supply, infrastructure? It's better to keep it in public hands for the benefit of everyone. Doesn't mean the government can't make deals with local companies. If the government has to repair streets or maintain bridges, they will use companies to do the job, hiring freelance engineers and road construction companies. So, even if you're paying taxes, some of the money is geting back to the people, as some of it is also used with companies doing a job.
The "free protection by police forces" never, ever helped me at all, while I could have helped myself with far less effort if they didn't do everything in their power to prevent me from being armed.
Also... best possible treatment? From state doctors?
Really? It never did? Not even once? Can you not imagine at least once case where it might be helpfull. You know, just because you never had to use the police, doesn't mean they are not there and doing their job. Traffic laws, fighting crime, investigation and so on. You do benefit from the relative safety that is estabiled by law enforcements. What ever if you use them directly or not.
When I am talking about doctors, I am not talking about state doctors, I am talking about verification from independed authorities, so that not everyone can call him self a doctor or internist, just because they got their certificate for 20 000 dollar by the Huckleberry Finn Acadame from the Bahamas. There has to be some standard.
You want to see corporate education in action?
All the examples you just gave also apply to slaves on a plantation, except the education.
Absolutely ...